Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary

...now browsing by category

 

Five Important things to do at GCTS

Tuesday, August 24th, 2010

Over the past six months we’ve received several emails asking about what we might recommend for new students to do at GCTS. Primarily students are concerned about “must-take” classes, or little hints for excelling at GCTS. It ought to go without saying, but the most important ingredient for excelling at Gordon-Conwell, or any other school for that matter, is hard work. But here is a list of five things we’d recommend to students, new and old, at our alma mater.

1. Take BTI Classes – Through the Boston Theological Institute you are afforded a number of opportunities as a student at GCTS. Not only do you have access to the libraries at each member school (a huge help in and of itself), but you can also cross-register classes. Most people pile on the classes at Harvard, and that is all well and good, but don’t miss some of the other great opportunities at BTI schools, especially Boston University and Boston College. Our personal list of recommendations is: Textual Criticism of the Hebrew Bible with Dick Saley at Harvard, and anything with Dr. Alejandro Botta at Boston University. We’ve also heard great things about Katheryn Pfisterer-Darr’s classes at BU. Of course you ought to also be on the lookout for classes that interest you with Peter Machinist and Jon Levenson, both at Harvard.

2. Take language classes – If you plan on learning to study the Bible, you want to go on for a PhD, or you just enjoy learning, then there is really no substitute for learning as many languages, at as high a level, as possible. Intermediate Hebrew at GCTS is a must, as are Aramaic and Ugaritic. We’d also recommend starting work on either Akkadian or Middle Egyptian (the latter can be had at BU with A. Botta). Also, don’t underestimate your own resources at Gordon-Conwell. If you are studying Old Testament or Biblical Languages, track down Tom Petter to take Epigraphic Hebrew and Advanced Hebrew Grammar (independent classes as of now). We also recommend plenty of Hebrew or Greek reading courses. We know it sounds lame to pay for three credits where you basically read/translate XX number of chapters and report to a professor about it before taking a final exam. But your Hebrew really will improve from the discipline. And please – certainly don’t neglect the basic languages. GCTS has a heavy emphasis on Greek and Hebrew, and if you don’t take the time to learn them well, you will suffer for it, both academically at GCTS and personally as you seek to go on for further study. Take advantage of that emphasis for your own benefit!

3. Listen to your fellow students, but also…don’t – What we mean by this is simple, your fellow students can be a great help. They can point you to resources you might not know about, tell you about classes you wouldn’t have taken otherwise, help to carpool to BTI courses, and a host of other things. However, it can also be discouraging when you talk to them. Time and time again Mandy and I were told never to take more than three classes a semester. Of course, if you do this, you’ll take three years just to complete a single MA. Mandy and I never took more than five, and we found our sweet spot to be four (which requires summer term classes to complete your degree in two years, three for the M.Div.). What we’re trying to say is this: know your limits academically, and go with those, regardless of whether others tell you you’re taking “too many” classes. If you’re getting As and you’re learning, don’t take fewer classes just because someone gets you worried.

4. Fill those “core requirements” with helpful classes – All MA students at Gordon-Conwell are required five “core classes.” At first, these classes can seem like throw aways. A world missions elective, Theology survey, Church history survey, etc, etc. However, if you have a religious studies/Bible college background, you are often able to waive the required theo and church history surveys and take more advanced electives in those areas. We really aren’t sure how to redeem the theology requirement yet, but we definitely recommend Historiography with Dr. Rosell if you can get the required survey waived. Also, don’t just throw away that world missions elective on “Personal Evangelism through the Local Church.” Instead, take Applied Anthropology with Paul Martindale. This class was without a doubt, for both of us, the single best non-biblical studies class we have ever taken. Dr. Martindale let us shape are research papers to a very large degree, and so we were able to interact with cultural anthropology in relationship with the Old Testament. We highly recommend this class.

5. Use Semlinks sparingly. Unless you live far enough away from the school that they become a vital part of completing your degree, don’t rely on them too heavily. They can be helpful for filling in a class or two, especially your core requirements, if you’re unable to take the advice in number four just because of the way classes pan out in the schedule, or if you need a summer class and there isn’t anything being offered that will meet your needs. Above all, do not use Semlinks for your basic language classes, Hebrew or Greek, especially if you’re going to be studying either language for the first time at GCTS (also, please, if you can avoid it, don’t take the basic language classes during the summer if you hope to retain the languages). Why do we give this advice? There is nothing wrong with Semlink courses, generally speaking. In fact, if you’re a pastor looking to brush up on Hebrew or Greek, do some extra study, or just an interested lay person, and you don’t want degree credit, the value for what you pay is phenomenal, and I’d highly recommend them. But the fact of the matter is, for degree-seeking students, there is just no substitute for in-classroom instruction.

In summary:
1. Take advantage of the BTI, and not just Harvard.
2. Take as many language classes as is helpful to your degree and personal goals.
3. Listen to the advice of others, but know your own academic limits.
4. Don’t waste your core requirements – if you can get waivers, look for classes that will relate somehow to your field.
5. Use Semlinks sparingly to fill in where scheduling doesn’t work out for you.

Feel free to contact either of us if you have questions, concerns, or would like further suggestions.

Why Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary?

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

As we have previously noted, Calvin and I are recent graduates from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. We each have two Master’s degrees – one in Old Testament and one in Biblical Languages. We both had a great experience at Gordon-Conwell (henceforth known as GCTS), but we know that choosing a grad school can be intimidating. You can review the website, catalogs, and talk to admissions personnel, but how do you really know what you’re getting yourself into before you get there? Of course, the best way is to talk to alum, so here is our list of what to expect based on our experience at GCTS – and why GCTS may or may not be for you.

Do note that we can’t speak very well to the non-Bible based degrees at GCTS, but we’re assuming that if you’re reading our blog, you’re interested in studying the Bible (as opposed to Church History, Counseling, Education, Missions, etc.). Calvin started off in the M.Div program, so we can lump that in with the Bible-based MA programs to some extent.

GCTS has a heavy emphasis on languages. GCTS requires Hebrew and Greek for their M.Div students, and you’ll also have to take one or both in the Biblical Languages, Old Testament, or New Testament degrees. The MABL is language intensive; the MAOT and MANT only require the basic Hebrew or Greek courses. However, don’t be fooled. Any Bible degree and the M.Div also require exegesis courses. And, when they say you need Hebrew and Greek for their exegesis courses, they aren’t kidding around with you. Don’t come to GCTS if you don’t really want to learn and work with the languages (though we personally can’t imagine why you wouldn’t if you’re seriously considering going on for further study in the Bible!). This isn’t the school for you. If, on the other hand, this sounds great to you – then absolutely consider GCTS. Not only do they have the basic courses as most seminaries do, but they offer advanced level courses both in-class and through independent study that I daresay you won’t find at any other seminary in the U.S. Also, the BTI opens up even more unique language opportunities. (We took a year of Middle Egyptian at Boston University while at GCTS!)

This is a conservative, evangelical, inter-denominational school. We don’t know if that is a good or bad thing to you, but accept the statement for what it is. GCTS is an inter-denominational school, and so you’ll have interaction with both students and professors from all areas of the evangelical sphere. This also means that GCTS is of necessity more relaxed and accepting of the variety of opinions found in all of these denominations. We think this is a good thing; if you don’t, you probably don’t want to go to GCTS. On the other hand, GCTS is a conservative evangelical school. Don’t go to GCTS expecting to learn about JEPD – except in the negative – or a lot about the higher criticisms (they do teach basic text crit). Inerrancy, especially, is a big sticking point for most of the Bible profs (we suspect that there are a few profs in the closet on this issue, however, though we won’t name names publicly), so if you’re on that edge or over it, be prepared to step carefully or be ready to have your views challenged frequently. Note that this isn’t necessarily a reason not to consider GCTS. If you’re prepared to do some independent study on the issues, you can make up for the lack in that area (and there’s always the BTI).

GCTS is part of the Boston Theological Institute. Speaking of the BTI, this is one major reason to seriously consider GCTS. If you want to go to a religious school as opposed to a state school for your master’s work, or are considering it, GCTS has the distinct advantage of being a part of the Boston Theological Institute. You can look up which schools are part of this online, but basically you can cross-register (at GCTS’s prices) at any of the schools in the institute (you’ll be limited to classes which are offered through the respective school’s divinity departments, i.e. Harvard Divinity School, Boston University School of Theology). What this all means is that you’ll have the opportunity to expand your horizons, even if for you it’s only personal enrichment, beyond the evangelical theological sphere. You’ll also be able to pick up some classroom instruction in some areas (see above) that GCTS neglects.

GCTS teaches a strong exegetical method. We went to a Bible college for our undergrad, and so we already had a strong background in Bible. However, if there’s one thing that stands out above all others as to what we learned at GCTS, it’s Bible exegesis. GCTS takes their emphasis on languages and runs with it. You’ll learn how to take what you think is the tiniest, most insignificant passage and pick it apart, examining it from every possible angle, and then bring it back together to be able to solidly interpret it. This is a failing in many non-religious or non-evangelical schools. You just won’t get the education in how to really dig in deep to the text at many other schools. If you’re even considering GCTS, we’re assuming you’re interested in actually examining the text itself, and you’ll learn to do that here. One cautionary note: if you don’t have a strong background in Bible going in to GCTS, you will go deeper rather than broader. For us, that was a good thing. It could be a failing for others who need the broad content before going deeper.

GCTS has high academic standards. GCTS is a good school. I’ll say it again. GCTS is a good school. If you have a weak academic background, be prepared to have to improve significantly if GCTS sounds like a school you want to go to. You will do hard work if you go to this school for Bible. You will read thousands of pages every semester. You will write lengthy, involved papers. You will translate, translate, translate. If you have a family, have to work to pay bills, want to be involved in church, and you’re determined to get mostly or all A’s, you will find yourself pressed, stretched, and probably often stressed. If you aren’t already very disciplined with your time, you’ll have to learn to be. This is, however, a good thing, because if you do well at GCTS, you can feel fairly confident that you didn’t cheat yourself: yes, you most likely can hack it at a “real school.”

GCTS is a large seminary. This means some great interaction with a lot of different type of people, and it means that they have the resources to offer all the great language classes and beyond. However, it also brings with it some negatives: for one, professors are very busy, for a variety of reasons. If you want to have face time with profs, you will have to take the initiative. Most are more than amiable toward meeting and chatting, but it’s going to be on you to make sure you get that time. Another drawback is that class sizes are larger than we would have liked. While there will be some smaller classes, especially electives, the required courses will more often than not have upwards of 30 or 40 people. Compared to the classes we took at the BTI, which were all less than 20 people, GCTS classes are very large. We know that at undergrad institutions it’s common to take classes where there are hundreds of people in a large lecture hall, but we feel that small class sizes are almost always better, especially when you get to the level of grad work.

We had a great experience at GCTS, and don’t regret choosing the school at all. Especially since we came with an undergraduate degree in Bible and some languages already under our belt, with waivers and working with profs, we were able to mold the degree programs to fit our personal goals. If you are looking to do master’s work at an evangelical institution and want to do the work, we would highly recommend considering GCTS.

A Shout out for the New Testament

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Some of you may know that Greek and I have a love-hate relationship. This semester, I have had the opportunity to take Exegesis of Revelation with Dr. Sean McDonough. As part of the course requirements, we are asked to read the entire book of Revelation in Greek (which makes sense, of course). At present, I have finished through chapter 14. I am pleasantly surprised to find that it actually hasn’t been that bad. What do you know.

Now, I know that the Greek of Revelation is not the hardest to be found in the NT, but generally speaking I find myself able to read with some proficiency (if not very rapidly) and have even enjoyed reading the book in Greek.

Of course, some of this may have to do with the fact that the class itself is one of the best I have taken at GCTS. Dr. McDonough is not only knowledgeable, but is also very engaging (and hilarious) as a teacher. His passion for the book of Revelation clearly comes through when he teaches, causing me to in turn feel excited about the subject. Of course, anyone who regularly uses examples from fantasy literature and media such as Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter is okay in my book.

My previous knowledge of Revelation has up until now been limited to what I know from reading the book in English and what I learned in my dispensationalist upbringing and my dispensationalist Bible college. I have since fairly thoroughly rejected dispensationalism, but at least as far as the book of Revelation goes, I’ve never heard a good teacher teach on the subject from another perspective, nor have I really bothered to study it out on my own in any depth. In fact, I’ve rather avoided Revelation like the plague (second only to Paul).

That being said, I am amazed to find that Revelation is an absolutely beautiful, amazing literary masterpiece, with a powerful message that seems to have been completely lost in the midst of pop theology of the Tim LaHaye variety. Since my knowledge is so stunted, my mind has been a sponge in this class.

It makes me wonder what would have happened if I had had a New Testament teacher like Dr. McDonough in college in addition to an absolutely amazing Old Testament teacher. No, no, don’t worry, I’m not thinking about changing to New Testament studies. However, it just goes to show you what excitement a good teacher who is passionate about his or her subject can generate. It has been refreshing to feel again like I did in Bible College when first discovering the joys of the Old Testament. Sometimes it is so easy to get bogged down in the papers and exams and pressures of trying to “perform” well, and forget the initial pure joy of learning about something I love that set me down this path.

That being said, I have a Revelation test tomorrow morning for which I need to go study!

Spring 2010 Classes

Monday, March 1st, 2010

It is my custom to bore you by briefly highlighting the classes I take each semester. Because of my now broken blogging silence I have not done so this semester. So, without further ado…

Middle Egyptian II – This is, as the title should make obvious, the second semester of a year long course in Middle Egyptian at Boston University. Let’s be honest, which one of us hasn’t wanted to learn Hieroglyphs as a kid? If you’re a sci-fi geek, you know that there is a far more important reason for learning ancient Egyptian: you might be asked to join the Stargate Program. All joking aside, another ANE language under my belt is a very good thing. What I’m about to say will probably reveal just how much of a geek I truly am (as if the Stargate comment above didn’t already do that), but I can think of very few things I would rather do than learn an ancient language. Besides, Dr. Botta is simply excellent. I’ve been thoroughly enjoying this class.

Exegesis of Revelation – Dr. McDonough teaches this class and I’ve found it truly fascinating. Not only is the professor engaging, but the regular references to the Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter are icing on the cake. I’ve not been a big fan of this, the final book of the Bible, but this class is changing that. It’s also helping to hone my Greek skills since we’re required to read the entire book in Greek.

Exegesis in the Minor Prophets – Another class with Dr. Stuart is always a good thing. Although I’ve covered the minor prophets in both undergrad, and in a more broadly focused class here at GCTS, I’m still finding this class informative. It is especially helpful because the majority of our class time is spent simply analyzing the Hebrew text, primarily from a grammatical perspective but also with attention to text criticism, structure, etc. In addition I’m writing a paper on Habakkuk 3 for the course, which is proving to be fascinating.

Applied Anthropology for Missions – As esoteric as the title sounds, this class is actually fun. I’m not an anthropologist, though I do find the subject interesting. Personally I think that there is a lot of payoff for Biblical interpretation in understanding one’s own culture as well as the culture of the text. I’m writing a paper on how epistemology influences the debate surrounding inerrancy. Although I’m fairly sure that this is going to be an eternal debate, at least it ties what I’m learning here back into Biblical studies.

Martin Luther – Really, what more can one say? Sometimes I think this guy really helped the church, and other times I’m convinced he’s the worst thing to happen to it since Constantine. Either way, the class is fun if for no other reason than we get into some heated discussions. This, of course, is one of the best ways to learn. If only I could figure out a way to manage a heated discussion in a Hebrew grammar class, I could feel I’ve accomplished something.

So, there you have it. Yes, I’m taking five classes my final semester. Yes, it’s possible I’m crazy. But what more can one do? There is so much to learn, and only a very short amount of time in which to learn it.

The Start of Fall 2009

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

My semester has officially begun. I’m very excited about the classes I’m taking this semester. I’m constantly reminded that GCTS truly affords students some wonderful opportunities when it comes to studying the Hebrew Bible and Hebrew language. Mandy has already posted her classes and so, without further ado, my classes:

Middle Egyptian I – I’m taking this class at Boston University. So far it has been absolutely wonderful. The professor is very concerned with moving at a pace the entire class can handle, and because of this he’d rather move too slowly rather than too quickly. Either way I’m finding the material fascinating. I think I’m doing well, other than the fact that I can not draw to save my life. Luckily the professor is gracious in this regard, and so I won’t have to worry too much about my grade being negatively effected by a falcon that looks a bit…odd.

History and Archaeology of the Ancient Near East – Mandy actually took this class two years ago, and I am not playing a bit of catch up. This class is extremely interesting. It makes me wonder if maybe, just maybe I might like digging in the Levant at some point in the not too distant future. Eric keeps encouraging me to join him at Tell es-Safi, and this class might help him in that goal. I’m also finding the textbooks (Mazar’s Archaeology of the Land of the Bible and Kuhrt’s The Ancient Near East) engrossing. Because of this I think Mandy is finding me odd.

Advanced Hebrew Grammar – This is the single class that I have been looking forward to the most. Dr. T. Petter is doing a directed study with Mandy and I. Throughout the summer the syllabus has morphed and changed as the three of us (Dr. Petter, Mandy and I) have all given input. Now that the syllabus has been finalized I can say with confidence that I’m excited. We’ll be focusing on the Biblical Hebrew verbal system in prose. I will probably solicit your suggestions on additional readings that might be helpful to us in the coming weeks. The final evaluation for the course will be a paper dealing with the verbal system in prose via an analysis of a pericope in Judges, with special attention to the verbal system throughout the book. The specifics, of course, are subject to some small amount of change over the next couple weeks, but that’s the basic outline.

OT Prophetical Books – This will be my first class with Dr. D. Petter, and it seems like it’s going to be great. It has been a while since I’ve done any type of sustained study in the prophets, and so that alone makes this interesting. Dr. Petter is also extremely personable, and I’m sure that the class itself will be fascinating. It’s also another opportunity to work with the Hebrew text and that is always a worthwhile endeavor.

Akkadian – Finally, I will be taking Akkadian this semester. It might more properly be called “An introduction to Akkadian grammar,” since we won’t be learning any vocabulary, nor will we be learning the signs. Nevertheless I think this will be an interesting class as it will allow me yet more exposure to semitic languages. I fear my excite for this class is somewhat dimmed in light of the flaring beacon that is Middle Egyptian, but I still expect the class to be interesting.

It’s That Time of Year!

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

With the Fall semester just around the corner, it’s time for my beginning of semester run-down of classes. This semester is going to be a doozy – I have 5 resident classes and 1 SemLink (GCTS’s distance ed), not to mention doctoral apps and ministry at church (including the Hebrew class that I am now teaching).

Advanced Hebrew Grammar with Tom Petter
Calvin and I are really looking forward to this. It’s an independent study, but since we’re both taking it we’ll essentially be doing all the work together – which will include translating and syntactically tagging the entire book of Judges. I’m excited to see how this goes.

Intermediate Greek with Dave Mathewson
I’m kinda neutral towards this class – it’s required for my MABL and I really need it anyways to help further cement my Greek. But, as I’ve mentioned before on multiple occasions, Greek isn’t really my first love. However, I’ve heard that Dr. Mathewson has a different take on the Greek verbal system than we learned in Greek I & II so that should be at least mildly interesting to learn about.

Prophetical Books with Donna Petter
This is the first class I will have taken with the other Petter at GCTS, so I’m curious to see what her teaching style is like. You may remember that I took Poetical Books with Doug Stuart last semester and had fun typing my Lamentations exegesis paper, which has shown up in various parts over the summer on this blog. This time, I’m hoping to be able to do something in Jeremiah. I may also find out if I can sub in a research paper instead of the exegesis paper – since I’ve already done one at the 700 level.

Exegesis of James with Sean McDonough
I took Exegesis of John, my required Gospel exegesis course this past summer, and now I’m getting the epistle requirement out of the way this fall. I am, of course, neatly avoiding Paul. James is one of my favorite NT books, so I’m sure this class will present some fun tidbits for thought (even if it is more GREEK).

Middle Egyptian I with Alejandro Botta
We are taking advantage of the BTI again this year, and will be taking this class at Boston University. From what I understand, it’s a joint offering from the School of Theology and the Archaeology Department. We already have our textbooks for this one (just came in today!) and I’m pretty psyched. It’s going to be a lot of work, but worth it, I think.

Contemporary Theology and Theologians
This is the SemLink that I have had all summer to work on but have barely touched. Unfortunately, between two summer classes and visiting family for the past 3 weeks, I haven’t had a whole lot of spare time. That means this is essentially a sixth class I have to do this semester, which will make my life very hectic, to say the least. Nevertheless, I am and have been looking forward to some of the reading.

Lamentations 2:18-22: Text and Translation

Monday, June 15th, 2009

As promised, I am going to begin pulling sections out of the exegesis paper that I wrote for Dr. Stuart (Old Testament Poets) this past Spring semester, and posting them here. Since this was a Hebrew exegesis paper, the Hebrew text remains important throughout. What follows is my re-constructed text and my own translation of this passage. I will post text-critical and translation notes in further posts (otherwise this could get quite long).


18
צעק לבם אל אדני חומת בת ציון
הורידי כנחל דמעה יומם ולילה
אל תתני פוגת לך אל תדם בת עינך
19
קומי רני בלילה לראש אשמרות
שפכי כמים לבך נכח פני אדני
שאי אליו כפיך על נפש עולליך
20
ראה יהוה והביטה למי עללת כה
אם תאכלנה נשים פרים עללי טפחים
אם יהרג במקדש אדני כהן ונביא
21
שכבו לארץ חוצות נער וזקן
בתולתי ובחורי נפלו בחרב
הרגת ביום אפך טבחת לא חמלת
22
תקרא כיום מועד מגורי מסביב
ולא היה ביום אף יהוה פליט ושריד
אשר טפחתי ורביתי איבי כלם

18
Their heart cries out to Adonai.
O wall of Daughter Zion!
Bring down tears like a torrent
day and night
Do not allow yourself rest
Let not the pupil of your eye be still
19
Arise, cry aloud in the night
at the beginning of every watch
Pour out your heart like water
before the face of Adonai
Lift to him your palms
for the sake of the life of your children
20
“Look, O Yahweh, and see!
To whom have you inflicted in this way?
Should women eat their fruit
the children for whom they cared?
Should they be slain in the sanctuary of Adonai
the priest and the prophet?
21
On the ground, in the streets, they lay down
the youth and the elder
My young women and my young men
fell by the sword
You slew in the day of your anger
You slaughtered mercilessly
22
You summoned like a feast day
my terrors from all around
And there was not, in the day of the anger of Yahweh,
an escapee or a survivor
Those whom I cared for and reared
my enemy destroyed them”

Specialization and Languages

Wednesday, June 10th, 2009

Jay, over at mu-pàd-da, has some interesting thoughts on language work within academic sub-disciplines. I found his thoughts worthwhile, and I’d encourage others to visit his blog and comment.

I have noticed something related to Jay’s thoughts in regards to studying the Hebrew Bible. Most students who set out to study the Hebrew Bible will also study another major area in their PhD work. Most of those students will opt for Akkadian, whereas a relatively small number will opt for either Egyptian or intensive work in Northwest Semitic dialects. I’ve also found this fascinating for several reasons. First, when I was an undergrad student, I naively believed that becoming an Old Testament scholar required a sound knowledge of Hebrew and Biblical Aramaic. Greek–I believed–was for those who studied the Jesus Festschrift (HT: Jim Getz). Now, of course, I know better. In fact, by the time I graduate from GCTS I’ll have at least some proficiency in Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, Ugaritic, Moabite (if you consider this to be separate from Hebrew), Middle Egyptian and Akkadian (if knowing some basic grammar and vocabulary counts as “proficiency”).

This actually brings me to the second reason that I find Jay’s thoughts so fascinating: those of us who work with ancient documents, specifically those from the ancient near east, learn a very large number of languages. I find this to be a helpful and fun pursuit, though I doubt everyone feels that way. I’m not sure what a PhD program in Classics looks like, but I would assume that it does not expect the same number of ancient languages to be mastered.1 I’m not making a judgment on whether this is good or bad, simply observing that I find it interesting.


  1. Since I had a few moments to look, I compared Johns Hopkins Hebrew Bible program with its Classics program. The Classics program requires Latin and Greek (obviously), JHU’s Hebrew Bible program requires Hebrew, Akkadian or Egyptian, Ugaritic, Aramaic, and NWS epigraphy–it also mentions three optional languages, Coptic, Rabbinic Hebrew, and Syriac.

The End of Another Semester

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

Calvin already posted his end of semester summary, so I figured I’d copy him and give some thoughts on my classes.

Epigraphic Hebrew – This independent study with Tom Petter was great fun (especially since Calvin and I were able to work on it together). It also connected to History of Israelite Religions a little bit, since I did my paper for that class on the Kuntillet ‘Ajrud inscriptions, which we translated for this class. I always enjoy it when my classes seem to fit together well, as it cements what I’m learning.

History of Israelite Religions – Calvin has sort of already beat me to the punch since we took three classes together this semester. However, I too enjoyed this class at Boston University. My paper on Asherah in the Kuntillet ‘Ajrud inscriptions was nothing new, but I learned a ton and enjoyed researching it. I think I have now read or skimmed almost all of the major scholars (with works in English) who discuss this issue, which makes me feel good.

Greek II – What else is there to say, other than this was the second half of Greek? As I’ve mentioned before, Greekand I are not good friends, but we force ourselves to get along out of necessity. And it’s a good thing, because between Interpreting the New Testament, two NT exegesis courses, and Intermediate Greek, all classes I need to take within the next year, Greek and I are going to be seeing a lot of each other.

Old Testament Poetical Books – Calvin gave a good summary of the class itself, but I, of course, had a different paper topic. I chose Lamentations 2:18-22, and only wish I could have had more time to go even deeper than I did. My paper was just a little under 50 pages, and that was only scratching the surface. Lamentations is my new favorite book of the Bible, and I’m looking forward to doing more work with it in the future. Don’t be surprised if you see posts on Lam. 2:18-22, or Lamentations in general, showing up frequently this summer.

Thus ends two years here at GCTS. I have one more to go, and can’t believe how fast it’s gone!

The End of Spring 2009

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

Last Monday I turned in my final essay for this semester. For the past week I have relaxed by playing video games (a pastime that is notably, and sadly, absent from my life during the semester), reading fiction (David Coe is my newest find), and otherwise taking things easy. Normally at the beginning, middle and end of a semester I talk about what classes I am taking/took and share some of my thoughts on them. Here is my mid-semester summary for Spring 2009. Generally my thoughts at the semester mid-point have carried through to the end of the semester. My specific thoughts follow.

Epigraphic Hebrew – Wow. That’s all I can say about this course (an apparent lie, since I go on to type a paragraph about the course). Tom Petter was great to work with. Having an introduction to inscriptional Hebrew under my belt is great. To top it off, the class was fun as well. The class mostly consisted of translating various inscriptions (including the Mesha Stele). Dr. Petter also expected that Mandy and I would spend some time doing additional research on the various inscriptions. This added to the workload, but payed off by giving a much fuller picture of the current scholarship on various inscriptions (e.g. Kuntillet Ajrud). This was my favorite class over the past semester.

History of Israelite Religions – Much of what I said at the mid-point still holds true for this course. I learned quite a bit, it was fun, and taking a class at Boston University was a different experience. To some extent all this class did was show me how broad, diverse, and multifaceted the study of Israelite Religions really is. This is a good thing, though I might have preferred a more chronologically oriented introduction to Israelite Religions, I also realize that such an approach has its own difficulties. We basically worked our way through Ziony Zevit’s The Religions of Ancient Israel, and then spent some time with Jon Berquist’s Judaism in Persia’s Shadow. The course was a seminar, so each class session included a presentation or two by students. Normally I’m a huge fan of this type of learning. In this case I might have preferred a little more lecture from the professor. Either way, this class was fun, I learned a great deal, and I started to develop a relationship with Dr. Botta which has opened the possibility of taking Middle Egyptian next year (more on that in a subsequent post).

Old Testament Poetical Books – This is the standard GCTS intro to the poetic corpus (for those not in the know: Psalms, Proverbs, Qohelet, Job, Lamentations and Song of Songs). Since Job is one of my research interests, and a book that I find absolutely fascinating, the course was fun. My final paper, an exegetical study of Job 5.2-7, ended up just shy of 50 pages–so I certainly had the chance to engage with the material. To some extent I feel bad for Dr. Stuart, who has a whole class’ worth of papers to grade. As I said at the mid-semester mark, I would have preferred the class to be a little more demanding, but even so the translation we did was helpful when combined with the classroom discussions of Hebrew grammar. I would have preferred more of such discussions, but I’ll take what I can get.

Targumic Aramaic – This class was my least favorite of the semester. This isn’t to say the course was horrible, but one of my classes has to be my “least favorite.” The class is exactly what the title suggests: Targumic Aramaic. After working my way through a grammar, I translated around 15 chapters of Aramaic. I think I have a fairly decent handle on Targumic Aramaic after this course, though my vocab needs expansion.