The title of this post seems better suited to my friend Earl’s blog than my own. I don’t mean anything philosophical or metaphysical or whatever else theologians mean by questions like this. I simply mean, what is God like? Who is he in terms of his identity and his relationship with creation. I don’t normally post about my own faith and religious experience on this blog, for a variety of reasons. Nevertheless, I’m making an exception in this case because I believe that Jay brings up some good points. Also, I know exactly how Jay feels.
Although I attend church (and very much love my present church context) I do, at times, find myself wondering if I believe in the same God in which much of Evangelical Christianity believes. The answer is often “no.” This was a pretty scary realization when I originally…realized it.1 Soon after this, however, I figured that I believed in the God of the Bible, and I’d take him over the theological construct to which much of Evangelicalism clings.
In short, John Anderson pretty much sums up who God is, “God is . . . . a paradox. Vulnerable yet powerful. Tricky yet faithful. Present yet absent.” My God is a paradox, I’m okay with that. I understand that for many people God being a paradox is an uncomfortable thought. I’m sensitive to that, but if one claims to have a high view of Scripture, how can one dismiss the Scriptures’ view of God?
- See, English can use cognate accusatives too! ↩
Thanks for noting this, guys. It is indeed a puzzle to me how such a “pick and choose” mentality can exist on this issue. We all have our canon within a canon, sure, but my canon isn’t very realistic (or interesting, for that matter) if it doesn’t contain Job. Or the wrestling match with Jacob in Genesis. Or the notion of ‘the ban’ in the DH. God is a paradox, as you quote me as saying. It seems to me God enjoys traversing the boundaries that have been set for him.
I have a second post up on this now as of today. Do check it out and comment.