<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fairly Conservative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefloppyhat.com/2008/10/29/fairly-conservative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefloppyhat.com/2008/10/29/fairly-conservative/</link>
	<description>The journey of two people towards PhDs and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:15:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://www.thefloppyhat.com/2008/10/29/fairly-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefloppyhat.com/?p=78#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Len, we&#039;re actually not with Peter Enns, who is &quot;Very Conservative,&quot; though I find it somewhat amusing that we and Art were right next to each other on the list. 

N.T. Wrong now has a post up giving some of his criteria for labeling different blogs as he did. With the added explanation, I agree that we fall into the &quot;fairly conservative&quot; bunch--at least under his system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Len, we&#8217;re actually not with Peter Enns, who is &#8220;Very Conservative,&#8221; though I find it somewhat amusing that we and Art were right next to each other on the list. </p>
<p>N.T. Wrong now has a post up giving some of his criteria for labeling different blogs as he did. With the added explanation, I agree that we fall into the &#8220;fairly conservative&#8221; bunch&#8211;at least under his system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Flack</title>
		<link>http://www.thefloppyhat.com/2008/10/29/fairly-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Flack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 02:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefloppyhat.com/?p=78#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I should clarify that when I use the term liberal, I don&#039;t mean it as a negative thing, just a positional thing... Unlike many of our peers from the undergrad days who used the term to mean &quot;hell-bound heathen&quot;... But you knew that.

Just sayin&#039;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should clarify that when I use the term liberal, I don&#8217;t mean it as a negative thing, just a positional thing&#8230; Unlike many of our peers from the undergrad days who used the term to mean &#8220;hell-bound heathen&#8221;&#8230; But you knew that.</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Len Flack</title>
		<link>http://www.thefloppyhat.com/2008/10/29/fairly-conservative/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Len Flack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefloppyhat.com/?p=78#comment-34</guid>
		<description>I find the classifications interesting.  Now granted, I don&#039;t really follow the biblioblogosphere (is that a good term?), so I have no reference point to base evaluations on, but I didn&#039;t expect you to be in the same cohort as Art Boulet and Peter Enns. From talking to Calvin I&#039;d of guessed you&#039;d be morw with Jim Getz as &quot;liberal&quot;.

Interesting either way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the classifications interesting.  Now granted, I don&#8217;t really follow the biblioblogosphere (is that a good term?), so I have no reference point to base evaluations on, but I didn&#8217;t expect you to be in the same cohort as Art Boulet and Peter Enns. From talking to Calvin I&#8217;d of guessed you&#8217;d be morw with Jim Getz as &#8220;liberal&#8221;.</p>
<p>Interesting either way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

